| 
 News
      Release:  Politicians must punish
        Canadian distributor of "Deadly"
       
 Note regarding the Globe and Mail article
      below (Karla's Investors Say They Want Cash).   Peter Simpson of
      Norstar Filmed Entertainment, who is identified in this item as the
      Canadian representative of "Karla's" American producer,
      previously tried to make another movie about the case.  Simpson's
      movie, based on the book  Invisible Darkness, was roundly condemned
      by politicians.  Apparently, Simpson is still interested in trying to
      cash in on these terrible crimes, as evidenced from his role in
      "Karla".  Read more about Invisible Darkness and Mr.
      Simpson in this section, including a letter I wrote to him that provides
      details on some of the funding he's received from government.  Isn't
      it nice to know that we, the taxpayer, give money to people like Simpson? Valerie Smith, Toronto, Ontario May 10, 
		2007 
 Karla's investors say they want cash May 10, 2021Globe and Mail
 By Simon Houpt
 NEW YORK - A war of words has erupted
      between the American producer and the Canadian distributor of Karla after
      the controversial feature film about Karla Homolka failed to turn a profit
      at the box office and had its DVD release delayed by more than a year
      because of resistance from video distributors. Michael Sellers, the chief executive
      officer of Burbank-based MovieBank Studios and the film's producer,
      accused Christal Films of Montreal this week of failing to share any of
      the box-office earnings or even provide him an accounting of the film's
      performance despite more than six months of queries. "I need some ammunition to go to my
      investors with," Sellers said. "They haven't seen a penny from
      Canada. "Because of that, there's a growing
      sense that I'm not pursuing their case aggressively enough, and there's a
      lot of pressure building on me." His Canadian representative, Peter Simpson
      of Norstar Filmed Entertainment, who helped broker the deal, said he was
      embarrassed he had vouched for Christal president Christian Larouche. "I've gone from threatening to begging
      to appealing to his better half - apparently he doesn't have one,"
      said Simpson. According to figures provided to The Globe and Mail by
      Christal, Karla took in about $600,000 during its eight-week Canadian
      theatrical run, which began in January, 2006. The agreement between the
      two companies calls for MovieBank to receive 10 per cent of the film's
      gross receipts, which, after the theatres have taken their cut, works out
      to about $30,000 to $40,000. However, this week Christal's Larouche
      insisted his company didn't owe MovieBank anything. "We spent money
      to launch the picture," he said. "The film didn't do what it was
      supposed to do on theatrical, so we cannot [pay MovieBank] until we
      recoup." Simpson says the company spent far too much
      on advertising and distribution expenses.Given the title's toxic
      reputation, Sellers said, "the perception at the time was that the
      DVD was really where the money was." But the film's likelihood of
      recoupment was seriously damaged after Christal scuttled plans for a DVD
      release last summer. At the time, the company refused to offer an
      explanation to the press. But in an e-mail to an expectant fan, a Christal
      representative said Sellers had put the project on hold and, therefore,
      the company's hands were tied. In fact, e-mails recently obtained by The
      Globe and Mail show that Sellers and Simpson were outraged that Christal
      had nixed the DVD release, and were working furiously behind the scenes to
      take back the non-theatrical rights in order to salvage some of the film's
      potential earnings. But their phone calls, e-mails and other entreaties
      failed entirely. Simpson said he was disappointed that several meeting he
      had set up with Christal representatives at last September's Toronto Film
      Festival were scheduled and cancelled. This week, Larouche said the
      problem with the DVD release had been a wariness among Christal's video
      distribution partners. "Nobody at that time wanted to touch it, so we
      decided to let the situation cool a bit," he said. "We know a
      lot of people want to see the movie." He added that Christal will release the DVD
      on its own this September. Informed of the news, Sellers groused,
      "Nice to learn that from the press." His partner in the venture didn't mince
      words given the fear within the film industry over piracy, distributors
      commonly seek to release movies on DVD as soon as possible. "What's
      with him releasing in September?" asks Simpson. "What kind of
      idiot pretends he understands the business and lets piracy rip off every
      dollar opportunity like that?" The DVD came out last month in the U.S. and
      can be easily ordered online. Like many other films, Karla is also
      believed to be available for illegal downloading. Simpson added that he believes Christal had
      not fully attempted to capitalize on the film by selling it into other
      markets such as broadcast or pay-TV. Larouche did not return a call and an
      e-mail seeking further comment. Ever optimistic, Sellers said the delay in
      the Canadian DVD release could have one potential upside: It would give
      him time to prepare special features such as a roundtable of experts on
      the Homolka case, as well as a producer's commentary, which he had
      proposed to Christal last spring. "One of the things I'm really itching
      to do is take people on a guided tour of this movie," he said.
      "I'd like to say, 'This is what we thought we were doing, this is
      what we saw, this is what [the star Laura Prepon] was thinking when she
      played this scene. This is how the filmmakers intended this scene to be
      understood,' " he said. "That's another reason to try to get
      back on track with these guys." 
 Karla flick sure to bring more pain Film is pretty well done but don't expect anything new
January 11, 2021Toronto Sun
 By Alan Cairns
 Misha Collins and Laura Prepon play Paul
      Bernardo and Karla Homolka in the movie Karla. This scene didn�t make
      the final cut. Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka's horrible creep show has
      finally made it to Hollywood. But don't expect a happy ending to the
      movie Karla, a low-budget Ken and Barbie-gone-horribly-wrong shock flick
      that will leave the secrecy of a California studio and come to a theatre
      near you on Jan. 20. Not even Hollywood can turn this sordid and
      twisted tale into a winter heartwarmer. I predict that some rather chilling
      renditions of the rapes and deaths of victims Tammy Homolka, 15, Leslie
      Mahaffy, 14, and Kristen French, 15, will likely have you throwing up your
      overpriced popcorn. The names of the young victims are changed
      but those of us who lived through this will know exactly who they are.
      Moviemaker Michael Sellers claims Karla is based on court transcripts from
      Paul Bernardo's summer 1995 trial. As someone who reported on the case for the
      Toronto Sun and co-authored the book Deadly Innocence with former Sun
      scribe Scott Burnside, I can tell you after watching a pre-release copy of
      the movie in the newsroom yesterday that the assertion is largely true. Sellers tries his best to capture the
      essence of Bernardo and Homolka and often goes to extremes to make scenes
      and props authentic. For example, Bernardo's champagne gold Nissan sports
      car, the couple's Rottweiler puppy, Buddy, and the interior of the
      couple's rented Port Dalhousie home are pretty much spot on. But there are also truths that will really
      hurt. The sickening homemade movies that Justice
      Patrick Lesage felt were too evil and depraved to show publicly in
      courtroom 6-2 at 361 University Ave. 10 years ago will violently be
      splashed across the silver screen. While the brutal scenes and Bernardo's
      scripting of his victims have been watered down, squeezed and compressed,
      they remain stark and can only mean more hurt for the murdered girls'
      parents. And don't expect anything new from Karla.
      The movie largely trots out the same old stuff that was plastered across
      the front pages of daily newspapers and lead the nightly TV newscasts at
      the time of Bernardo's trial and has since then been covered by at least
      four major books. BEAUTIFUL-YET-DEADLY The movie portrays the cataclysmic events
      that occurred between the couple's animal-like sex-at-first-sight meeting
      in October 1987 and their sensational confrontation at Bernardo's 1995
      trial. Moviemaker Sellers tries to enter "the
      facts" of the beautiful-yet-deadly couple's crimes through a
      part-fact, part-fiction mind-bending session between Homolka and a
      psychiatrist prior to her 2001 early release hearing. Homolka is portrayed as part-vamp,
      part-victim by actress Laura Prepon. As good an actress as Prepon is, she
      is far too strong and assertive to play the morally and emotionally
      lacking Homolka. Prepon is also way too beautiful and sexy
      in the role. Misha Collins' scene-by-scene portrayal of
      Bernardo is pretty much right on, although Bernardo's character
      development is sadly lacking. The ultimate outcome is a series of
      fact-based highlights of sex, abuse, rape and murder sandwiched clumsily
      between Homolka's explanation of events to the shrink. There are also some startling errors and
      omissions. A major invention in the movie occurs when
      the shrink tells Homolka that an FBI profiler, an RCMP supervisor and the
      cops believe Paul Bernardo's claims that Homolka killed Kristen French. The assertion -- that a captive Kristen
      strangled herself after Homolka hit her with a mallet as she tried to
      escape -- was in fact made by Bernardo's lawyer John Rosen during
      Bernardo's trial. CREATIVE LIBERTIES Also made up was a TV news segment which
      falsely puts Homolka on the run after Bernardo's arrest. Oddly, the movie ends with Homolka speaking
      as a narrator to the viewer. Incredibly as it may seem, the movie fails
      to make any reference of the fairytale-like wedding the couple had in
      Niagara-on-the-Lake June 29, 1991. It seems to me the horse-and-carriage,
      tuxedo and gown, roast pheasant affair would be just perfect for
      Hollywood. Also conspicuous by its absence is the Hawaiian honeymoon
      departure only days later. Perhaps the props and extras needed for the
      wedding -- and the trip to Hawaii -- were beyond the budget? But to be fair to Sellers, anyone would
      have a tough time boiling years and years of sensational, shocking and
      well-documented events down to an hour and a half or so of movie script. 
 Homolka film spurs global interestDecember 7, 2020Globe and Mail
 By Gayle MacDonald
 A firestorm of protest here over the
      release of the film Karla -- a low-budget movie about Karla Homolka and
      Paul Bernardo's schoolgirl-killing spree -- has apparently only whetted
      the appetite of European distributors, who are snapping the movie up. The film's producer, Michael Sellers of
      Hollywood-based Quantum Entertainment, has sold Karla to 12 European
      territories, where distributors have been impressed, he says, with his
      movie's "artistic merits" as well as with Laura Prepon's
      performance as Homolka. Sources close to Sellers added yesterday
      that Quantum is on the verge of finalizing a distribution deal in Canada,
      which could be announced early next week. Sellers refused to comment, but
      said that he has been speaking to a handful of distributors in Canada who
      have expressed "strong interest." A deal will guarantee a new
      round of debate about the merits of dramatizing the exploits of two of
      this country's most loathed criminals. The movie, which stars Prepon of That '70s
      Show fame, and Misha Collins as Bernardo, has distribution deals in
      Australia (Eagle Entertainment); in Belgium, the Netherlands and
      Luxembourg (Moviebank BVE); in Brazil (Alphaville Films); in Germany,
      Switzerland and Austria (Falcom Media Group); and also in Norway, Sweden,
      Finland and Denmark (where it will be released by CCV-AS). "Our distributor in Germany, for
      instance, is the same company that did Monster [Charlize Theron's
      Oscar-winning turn as serial killer Aileen Wuornos]," says Sellers.
      "Our film has the same kind of attributes as a film like Monster. And
      there has been a positive reaction particularly to Laura's performance as
      Homolka." If a Canadian distribution deal is reached,
      the film will likely hit theatres some time during the first half of 2006.
      That will be a further blow to the families of the victims, who are
      reeling from a Quebec Superior Court decision last week to remove all the
      restrictions placed on Homolka since her release from jail last summer.
      The government of Quebec will appeal that ruling. In Karla, Homolka is apparently played as a
      victim for most of the film. As Globe and Mail reporter Simon Houpt put it
      recently: "I don't think that this is a portrayal that Karla Homolka
      herself is going to have that much trouble with." Sellers says he is fully aware of and
      empathetic to the sensitivity of the subject matter for all Canadians.
      "The film, I know, has a special set of circumstances in Canada. We
      have to be respectful and careful around that. But if one takes Canada out
      of the equation, the film has always held promise as one that would find
      an audience. It was up to us to make sure we made it the right way." Last fall, Karla was dropped from the
      lineup of the Montreal World Film Festival after sponsors threatened to
      withdraw support. Ironically, that controversy caught the attention of
      many international distributors, who suddenly had a hook to market the
      film. The Canadian film-distribution community is
      sharply divided over Karla. Last summer, distributor Jeff Sackman urged in
      an e-mail to 25 members of the Canadian Association of Film Distributors
      and Exporters that "we remain united in our membership (and
      community) that no one would pick this up." Others argued that it
      should be left for filmgoers to decide whether or not to buy tickets. "All I can say about Canada is that
      we're not being completely ignored," said Sellers, adding that a
      handful of distributors have expressed serious interest. He is also negotiating with various
      specialty distribution divisions of some of the major Hollywood studios.
      If a deal is not struck, Sellers adds, his company will distribute the
      movie on its own. 
 Families step aside on Homolka film - 'They are not the censor police' - Distribution in
      Canada now likelyOctober 13, 2021Toronto Star
 By Rick Westhead, Business Reporter
 The families of Kristen French and Leslie
      Mahaffy won't try to block the release of Karla, a film about the slayings
      of the teens, paving the way for the film's Canadian distribution. "The families recognize that they are
      not the censor police," Tim Danson, a lawyer for the French and
      Mahaffy families, told the Toronto Star. "They understand that people
      have a constitutional right to make a movie or write a book." The Hollywood film company behind the
      controversial movie, depicting the horrific murders by Paul Bernardo and
      Karla Homolka, says it's close to signing a contract with a distributor
      that would get the picture into Canadian theatres. Quantum Entertainment president Michael
      Sellers said in an interview yesterday that he is in final-stage
      negotiations with a distributor in Montreal. Sellers said the decision by the French and
      Mahaffy families marks "another hurdle that's been overcome in
      getting this movie made." Danson said he attended a private screening
      of Karla in a Toronto hotel suite two weeks ago. The lawyer said he raised
      concerns that any nude scenes depicting the teenaged victims or visual
      depictions of their murders may constitute child pornography. Quantum agreed to remove several scenes -
      including one eight-frame shot that depicted nudity, Danson said. A
      director's cut is unlikely, Sellers said. While the film won't feature nudity or
      visual depictions of the murders of the teenaged girls, a DVD version to
      be released next spring will likely include deleted scenes such as clips
      of the movie version of Bernardo's trial and his relationship with Homolka,
      Sellers said. While Danson said that the French and
      Mahaffy families, who have not seen the film, would prefer a movie wasn't
      made about their daughters' kidnapping and murder, he declined to
      elaborate on his views of the film after seeing it. "My role is not to be a movie
      critic," Danson said. Although Sellers declined to name the
      possible Canadian distributor, a film industry source said the likely
      company would be Christal Films, a production and distribution company
      created in 2001 by former Lions Gate Entertainment executive Christian
      Larouche. Sylvain Gagne, Christal's vice president of
      distribution and marketing, confirmed the company is negotiating with
      Quantum, although "nothing has been decided." In convincing the French and Mahaffy
      families not to try to block the film's release, Quantum has overcome a
      significant roadblock. Canada's major theatre chains had said that
      they wouldn't consider showing the controversial movie unless Quantum
      signed a contract with a Canadian distributor. Even with a distribution agreement in
      Canada, it's unclear what rating Karla might receive. Violent films
      typically receive a "restricted" rating, which limits their
      potential audience to those 18 years of age and older. It's possible that Quantum could turn a
      fortune off the movie even if it didn't appear on a single Canadian
      screen. Even without selling a single movie ticket
      or DVD in Canada, Sellers said Karla might garner as much as $100 million
      (U.S.) worth of revenue following its scheduled release after Christmas,
      bolstered by a "best-case" estimate of $50 million in U.S.
      ticket sales. The movie is scheduled to be released after
      Christmas, said Sellers, who also produced Fortunes of War, starring
      Martin Sheen, and Goodbye America with James Brolin. Karla was financed by a small group of
      individual investors and could generate as much as $7 million in foreign
      distribution rights in countries such as the U.K. and Australia and
      another $30 million in DVD sales and rentals, Sellers said. It might also generate income from sales to
      pay television companies like HBO or Showtime in the U.S. An industry
      source said Quantum is also negotiating a deal for U.S. distribution with
      companies including Vancouver's Lions Gate Entertainment and Sony
      Pictures. Karla, which stars Laura Prepon of the TV
      comedy, That `70s Show, was made for about $5 million, less than one-tenth
      the budget of some of today's large-scale Hollywood blockbusters, Sellers
      said.  
 Watching 'Karla': It's not flash and trashAn unfinished copy of the controversial movie is sombre,
      restrained even August 17, 2021Globe and Mail
 By Simon Houpt
 E-mail Simon Houpt Read Bio Latest Columns
      New York � Karla Homolka herself may not object much to the new
      true-crime drama about her and Paul Bernardo that a Los Angeles-based
      producer is currently fighting to bring into Canada. An unfinished cut of Karla presents Homolka
      as a physically and psychologically battered woman who is so afraid of
      losing her boyfriend-then-husband that she willingly if not willfully
      accedes to his increasingly depraved demands. Only when she finds herself
      perilously close to becoming another of Bernardo's murder victims does
      Homolka flee their home and turn state's evidence. A copy of the film, which is still a
      work-in-progress lacking a music soundtrack and a final mix of the
      dialogue, was obtained yesterday by The Globe and Mail from the film's
      producer. Karla unfolds as a series of flashbacks
      that spin out of a fictionalized version of a psychiatric assessment that
      took place in 2000, during a bid by Homolka for parole after she had
      served only eight years of her 12-year sentence. It notes that, after that
      request for parole failed, Homolka did not again submit to any voluntary
      psychiatric assessments. The film strives for a dissonance between
      its portrayal of Homolka-as-victim during the period that Bernardo was on
      his killing and raping spree, and the psychiatric evaluation many years
      later, during which Homolka is a calm and controlled woman spinning her
      self-justifying and self-delusional version of the murderous events that
      led to her incarceration. And while Laura Prepon is convincing as both
      battered victim and spinner, the inherently emotional nature of watching a
      woman who is utterly lacking in self-esteem submit herself to the whims of
      a sadist may prompt more sympathy for Homolka than the filmmakers intend. Most of the time in the film, Homolka is a
      mere witness to Bernardo's horrifying assaults, standing by guiltily,
      either unwilling or unable to do anything to stop them. Still, the film subtly notes that, when
      faced with the horrifying consequences of her actions, Homolka is
      concerned only with self-preservation. Moments after she learns of the
      death of her sister Tammy, even as she is wiping away tears, she quietly
      asks Bernardo where he'd put the videotape he made of the incident. Later
      on, as she broaches the possibility of turning Bernardo in to the
      authorities, she asks a lawyer, "If I help, can you get me
      immunity?" But Karla may as well be called Karla and
      Paul, for its focus is on the criminally dysfunctional development of
      their violent, abusive relationship. It traces the couple from their first
      meeting in the bar of a Toronto hotel, where the 18-year-old,
      ponytail-wearing Homolka is attending a veterinary conference, to the last
      moments they see each other, as they face off at Bernardo's trial, where
      he is convicted of 12 counts of rape and two counts of murder for the
      deaths of Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French. The film makes clear that, while profoundly
      unhealthy, the couple's embrace of the dark side began in earnest only
      when Homolka drugged her sister Tammy and presented her to Bernardo in a
      perverted attempt to please the boyfriend she feared she was losing. After
      Tammy's accidental death, Bernardo uses Homolka's guilt to force her to
      accept his increasingly brazen criminal behaviour. At one point, before he abducts Leslie
      Mahaffy (here called Leah McCarthy), Homolka confronts Bernardo when he
      drags himself home early one morning. "I just raped a girl," he
      tells her. She responds by desperately clinging to Bernardo, kissing him
      and telling him that she just wants to make him happy. Later, he becomes laughably cavalier about
      his extracurricular activities. Grabbing some nylon stockings for a
      disguise as he heads out the door one night, leaving Homolka home alone,
      he says, "I'm going out with some friends. Taking these, just in
      case." Those concerned about exploitation and
      gratuitous titillation may be relieved to know that the film, which has
      the feel of a movie-of-the-week, is sombre and directed with restraint.
      The production qualities are professional and polished. Nudity is all but
      absent, and the murders and rapes take place largely off-screen. French
      and Mahaffy are given pseudonyms. Indeed, the only woman abused at length
      on screen is Homolka herself, who in the film's final act submits to
      prolonged sexual humiliation at Bernardo's hands. The film will likely prompt wildly
      disparate responses from Canadian and American audiences. Canadians may
      find even common moments creepy, as when Misha Collins sits down next to
      Prepon, turns on a charming smile and says, "Hi. I'm Paul
      Bernardo." But for a film that centres on a
      psychiatric evaluation, Karla is void of most of the psychological insight
      and answers about motivation that audiences might desire. In the final
      minutes, the psychiatrist and Homolka share a brief rueful moment after
      she has recounted a one-night affair she had with a man after leaving
      Bernardo. "Why, Karla?" asks the psychiatrist. "Why
      not?" she replies, giving an answer that may just symbolize her
      entire approach to life. 
 Karla showings defendedBoycott of controversial film would resemble fatwa,
      distributor suggests August 15, 2021Globe and Mail
 By Simon Houpt
 New York � The Canadian film distribution
      community is sharply dividing over Karla, as the controversial drama about
      Karla Homolka nears completion and the film's Los Angeles-based producer
      steps up his attempts to find a route to a Canadian audience in the wake
      of the film's first positive review. In an e-mail to 25 members of the Canadian
      Association of Film Distributors and Exporters, Jeff Sackman says that he
      is "sickened by the daily press mentions of the film called Karla. It
      suggests that there are discussions with a number of distributors. I hope
      we remain united in our membership (and community) that no one would pick
      this up." Sackman noted that his company, ThinkFilm,
      currently has The Aristocrats in distribution, a comedy documentary that
      proudly features some of the most scatological and offensive language ever
      heard in mainstream cinemas. The Aristocrats is itself subject to a ban by
      the 3,500-theatre chain AMC Theatres in the U.S. "I see no irony in
      this," he wrote. But not all of the e-mail's recipients
      agree with Sackman. "It's not my role or anybody else's role to
      decide what should be seen by people or not," said Hussain Amarshi,
      the president of Mongrel Media. "Once we go on that path, it's not
      that far away from the fatwa of Khomeini against The Satanic Verses." Amarshi said Mongrel Media, which
      specializes in foreign films, would be unlikely to pick up Karla,
      "but I would defend the right of any distributor or anybody to be
      able to present this film, because all distributors have presented or
      distributed films that are considered to be controversial to other
      people." He noted that Hindu extremists tried to
      stop the filming of Water, a movie to be distributed by Mongrel that will
      open next month's Toronto International Film Festival. On the weekend, Karla received its first
      review from a journalist who had obtained a bootleg copy of the film from
      someone at the Montreal Film Festival. The film was slated to premiere at
      the festival at the end of the month but was uninvited two weeks ago when
      sponsors threatened to pull their support. Offering cautious praise in a re- view
      posted on the CBC website, Matthew Hays wrote that Karla could be read
      superficially as a tale of "a battered wife who could not escape the
      clutches of her violent, wildly manipulative mate." But the film,
      which unfolds as a series of flashbacks that spring out of fictional
      encounters between Homolka and a psychiatrist who seeks to understand her
      motivations, suggests Homolka may be an unreliable narrator. Further, Hays
      says that, as the title character, "Laura Prepon delivers a
      performance so measured and intelligent that it forces us to continually
      question Homolka's credibility as a victim." Michael Sellers, the film's producer, noted
      that the review and the support of a couple of key members of the Canadian
      film community who have seen the movie suggested that, "in spite of
      all the efforts to paint the film as sleaze and exploitation," people
      are concluding the film is "quality work by intelligent filmmakers.
      "As an American, based on my experience in my country, I'm just a
      little surprised at the willingness to vehemently call for a boycott and
      block access to a film without the courtesy of a viewing," Sellers
      added, speaking from the editing suite in Los Angeles where he is working
      on a final mix of the film. "Having said that, I want to
      acknowledge and be respectful of the emotions and passions that are a part
      of this whole situation, and it's clear to me that [Sackman] was writing
      from some deep conviction." Sackman recently tried to have the Canadian
      Association of Film Distributors and Exporters, a lobby group, take an
      official position against the film, but he abandoned the effort when some
      other members disagreed. The e-mail was an expression of personal
      frustration. Reached over the weekend for comment, Sack- man initially
      demurred, saying he resented the amount of press cover- age already heaped
      on both the film and Homolka herself. "I personally wish the media
      would not be covering this issue, because it's giving credibility to a
      film that probably doesn't deserve it, based on the producer's track
      record," he said. "This guy's exploiting the Canadian me- dia,
      which generates an emotional response in me on behalf of the people whose
      lives were affected by this criminal, and they can't read the newspaper
      without this reminder." He added that even a rave review couldn't
      change his position, and that he has "made it a personal mis- sion to
      convince others that it is not worth exploiting this particular film,
      regardless of whether it has any commercial or artistic merit." Others who are unconnected to the film are
      also trying to capitalize on its extraordinary prerelease press coverage.
      Yesterday morning, a Toronto businessman issued a call for support of
      Karla. Stuart Weinstein, who says he is developing a reality television
      show and a feature film about entrepreneur- ship despite the fact that he
      has no media experience, said the at- tempts by politicians to quash the
      distribution of Karla served as "a perfect example of how
      entrepreneurship is stifled in Canada."  
 Private screening eyed for Karla filmAugust 13, 2021Toronto Star
 By Martin Knelman
 Just as the furor over Karla Homolka's
      release begins to subside, here comes the sequel. This time the uproar
      concerns not Homolka herself but the movie Karla and its premiere � or
      lack of one. Now the L.A. producer plans to bring his
      movie to Toronto next month for a by-invitation-only screening during the
      Toronto International Film Festival, the Star has learned. That's in the wake of a debacle involving
      the Montreal Film Festival, whose boss Serge Losique cancelled Karla's
      Aug. 28 screening, caving in to Air Canada, which threatened to withdraw
      its festival sponsorship. "Film buyers from all over the world
      come to the Toronto festival," Michael Sellers explained in a phone
      interview yesterday, "and that certainly provides a good opportunity
      to put our film in front of foreign buyers." Maybe, but the Toronto festival, which
      screened two versions of the movie and declined to select it, will not be
      inviting Sellers to walk down the red carpet or providing any kind of
      welcome mat at all. Among the fierce opponents lined up against
      Sellers are not only Air Canada CEO Robert Milton, Premier Dalton McGuinty,
      and the families of murder victims Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy, but
      also powerful forces in the Canadian film industry. A few days ago, Jeff Sackman, CEO of the
      Toronto-based distribution firm ThinkFilm, sent an email to fellow
      distributors urging them to pass on Karla. "I hope we remain united in our
      membership (and community) that no one would pick this up," Sackman
      argued. He describes Sellers as "a third-rate so-called producer at
      best." But as Sellers points out � and Sackman
      himself admits � Sackman, like Air Canada and the Premier of Ontario,
      are making certain presumptions without having seen the film. That puts
      Sellers in the position of being targeted for the cultural equivalent of a
      lynching. The mob is not interested in hearing what
      Sellers has to say, but they might be surprised if they did. In
      conversation, Sellers emerges as articulate and extremely serious. "Sackman is coming from a place of
      deep passion and emotion," says Sellers, "but he hasn't seen
      this film, and I think it's unfair to deny even the possibility that it
      might be something more than tawdry exploitation. When people see the
      film, I think a lot of people will conclude that we have approached this
      material with intelligence on every level. We were guided by the ambition
      to provide the same kind of insight as Downfall (about Hitler) and Monster
      (about serial killer Aileen Wuornos)." A few ironies about Sackman's role as
      leader of the opposition: He was the executive producer of American
      Psycho, a movie based on Paul Bernardo's favourite book. ThinkFilm is currently distributing The
      Aristocrats, which is being hailed and reviled for its shocking and
      offensive language, leading the giant AMC chain to blackball it. ThinkFilm spent months trying to acquire
      DVD rights to Vlad, a low-budget horror film directed by Sellers, after it
      won prizes at two film festivals. At the moment, Sellers seems to be
      seriously outnumbered by his foes, but he does have one significant ally
      on this side of the border. To help launch his movie in Canada, Sellers
      has enlisted the support of Toronto producer Peter Simpson, a recent Genie
      lifetime achievement award winner. Simpson owns the rights to Invisible
      Darkness, the book by Stephen Williams about the horrific story of
      Bernardo, Homolka and their victims. A few years ago, Simpson was planning
      a movie version starring Jason Priestley, but was unable to get a
      satisfactory script. It was Simpson who approached the Montreal
      festival. After Losique bowed to Air Canada, one option was for the
      producers to screen the film privately in Montreal during the festival.
      Losique begged them not to. Sellers insists the movie does not glorify
      Karla. "I was interested in the psychological process by which Karla
      went from a schoolgirl with no criminal record to the woman who a few
      years later helped Bernardo first capture, then kill, Kristen French. What
      happened on that journey? What took her from one step to another?" Asked about the rights of the victims and
      the pain of their families, Sellers replies: "I have three daughters,
      age 14, 16 and 17. I can imagine, with great emotional intensity, what it
      would be like to lose a daughter in this manner." What people do not realize, he says, is
      what the tape transcripts on public record demonstrate about the victims. "They reveal extraordinary character
      and heroism on the part of these two girls. Leslie Mahaffy stayed calm,
      and in her worst moments, reached out to her family. ... She accepted her
      fate with grace and equanimity that is a startling affirmation of her
      humanity and courage. It is no disgrace to reveal her poignant, loving
      character in a film. "For her part, Kristen French tried to
      match wits with Paul. She tried to out-think him, and when that failed,
      she looked him in the eye and actually said, `There are some things worth
      dying for.' If I were her father, and a movie memorialized the moment when
      my daughter found the courage to look her captor in the eye and say that,
      I would not only want that movie to be made � I would make it." 
 Uproar helping promote Karla film, producer saysFest refusal seen to raise larger issuesMore forceful marketing considered
August 5, 2021Toronto Star
 By Keith Leslie, Canadian Press
 The producer of a film about notorious
      killers Karla Homolka and Paul Bernardo vowed yesterday to step up his
      efforts to have the movie screened in Canada, one day after the
      cancellation of a scheduled screening in Montreal. The decision by the Montreal World Film
      Festival to cancel the debut of the movie Karla came as a
      ``disappointment, but it's not a devastating disappointment," said
      producer Michael Sellers. "It, for the first time, has kind of
      pushed us to begin being a bit more assertive about the rights of the
      filmmakers. They're really making it harder for the film to have a life in
      Canada." Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty had been
      urging people to boycott the movie, which tells the story of Canada's most
      notorious couple and the brutal killings of schoolgirls Kristen French and
      Leslie Mahaffy. McGuinty congratulated the Montreal film
      festival organizers yesterday for cancelling the screening set for later
      this month. "These crimes were searing events in
      the life of this province," McGuinty said. "I have not
      understood how people would want to profit from that." Sellers said he knows Air Canada, a sponsor
      of the Montreal festival, did not want its logo to be posted during the
      screening of Karla, and he believes the airline was among those sponsors
      pressuring the festival to drop the movie. It shouldn't be up to corporations or
      governments to determine which films Canadians can see, he said. "It does raise rather interesting
      questions about free speech, artistic expression (and) government, and
      corporate control over access to art," Sellers said. "No one's
      being tied up in a chair and being forced to watch this film." Sellers said his company will review what
      he said has been a ``very careful and measured approach" to promoting
      the movie in Canada, and perhaps take a more aggressive stance in the
      marketing of the film. "This is starting to elevate itself to
      the level of an injustice against the rights of artistic expression,"
      he said. "We need to work hard to make sure (Karla) does get a chance
      in Canada." Sellers also said the uproar generated by
      the film in Canada has raised the film's profile. "I've had two other film festivals and
      two or three distributors call already this morning, so the news value of
      this and the controversy may in the end be positive," he said.
      "It's attracting international attention." The film is set for release this fall. It
      stars Laura Prepon, best known for playing Donna on TV's That '70s Show. 
 Montreal film festival pulls Homolka filmAugust 4, 2021By Tu Thanh Ha
 Globe and Mail
 Montreal � Bowing to sponsors such as Air
      Canada, the Montreal World Film Festival has dropped plans to play host to
      the premiere of the Hollywood movie about sex killers Karla Homolka and
      Paul Bernardo. "Half a dozen sponsors were going to
      pull their money," said a source who had spoken to festival president
      Serge Losique. In a statement released yesterday,
      organizers cited "the discomfort expressed by clients of its
      sponsors" as a reason for dropping the film Karla. As late as four days ago, an Air Canada
      executive was stating bluntly that the carrier was going to cancel its
      support. Duncan Dee, a senior vice-president at Air
      Canada, was answering a query from Marsha Boulton, the wife of Stephen
      Williams, author of two books about the Homolka-Bernardo case. "Air Canada informed the [Montreal
      World Film Festival] last week that it is cancelling its sponsorship of
      the event as a result of the festival's decision to screen Karla,"
      Mr. Dee e-mailed Ms. Boulton on July 31. A copy of the e-mail was made public by Mr.
      Williams yesterday. By yesterday, an Air Canada official was
      saying that the company was looking forward to seeing the festival's
      eventual lineup. "We are taking steps to dissociate
      ourselves from the screening of this movie," spokeswoman Isabelle
      Arthur said. "We'll see what will be in the [final] program." Mr. Losique didn't answer when The Globe
      and Mail called, just hours before the announcement, to ask about the
      prospect of losing sponsors. He is expected to unveil the final lineup
      next Tuesday. Yesterday, his decision shocked some who
      saw it as a setback for artistic freedoms. "I was hoping the people lobbying
      against the movie would see the folly of their way. This is a very
      dangerous precedent for the film business," said Peter Simpson, CEO
      of Norstar Filmed Entertainment Inc., the middleman who put Mr. Losique in
      touch with the producers of Karla. "This is appalling. It's
      outrageous," Mr. Williams said. "[Mr. Losique] went out on a
      limb and announced this with fanfare but he doesn't have the courage of
      his convictions." It was good news, however, for Tim Danson,
      lawyer for the families of Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy, the Ontario
      schoolgirls raped, tortured and murdered by Ms. Homolka and Mr. Bernardo. "It's nice to see in this day and age
      that, even in the movie industry, prudence, good judgment and common sense
      prevail," he said. "This is the way free speech is
      supposed to work. Nobody had to legislate. Nobody had to pass a law. It's
      public opinion coming to bear." Other sponsors contacted yesterday, such as
      Visa and Kodak, said they had supported the festival's right to pick its
      content. The festival runs from Aug. 26 to Sept. 5. 
 Montreal film festival exploiting memory of Homolka's victims: DansonJuly 26, 2021Canadian Press
 By Greg Bonnell
 TORONTO (CP) - The Montreal World Film
      Festival is exploiting the memory of Karla Homolka's schoolgirl victims by
      screening a controversial Hollywood movie chronicling her crimes, the
      lawyer for the victims' families said Tuesday. "We see this as being extremely
      exploitive and sensational," said Tim Danson of the festival's
      decision to host the international debut of the film Karla. "I think
      that is to exploit my clients' misery for (the festival's) own personal
      end. This is not the kind of film that you would normally anticipate to be
      at a film festival." The festival organizers were told of
      Danson's comments, but did not respond. Karla, set for release this fall,
      chronicles the ominous courtship of Homolka and Bernardo and the notorious
      deeds their union ultimately produced - the brutal murders of Ontario
      teens Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy. The film, originally titled Deadly, has
      encountered vocal opposition in Ontario from the public and politicians
      alike with numerous calls for a boycott. On Monday, it was announced Karla would
      make its premiere in Montreal sometime during the festival which runs Aug.
      26 to Sept. 5. "This is nothing more than an
      orchestrated and calculated attempt to give unique publicity to the
      Montreal Film Festival," said Danson, who couldn't rule out legal
      action to block the film's debut. "If we conclude that this film
      portrays (French and Mahaffy) in a way that offends the girls' dignity and
      memory and sense of honour, then we will consider that to be a violation
      of civil law," he said. "That could lead to an
      injunction." The families have been assured by the
      film's producer, Michael Sellers, that an exclusive screening would be
      arranged for them in Toronto and that some of the film's more explicit
      scenes have already been edited out. "The problem is, I only have his word
      on that. I have to see it," said Danson. The recent re-branding of the film from
      Deadly to Karla has been defended by Sellers, who argues the name Karla
      holds little emotional sway outside Ontario. Danson wasn't buying that argument Tuesday. "My sense is now that the name Karla
      Homolka has now been reported widely in the United States. The change of
      the name from Deadly to Karla (was done) to tap into that new
      awareness," said Danson, who appeared on numerous American news
      programs following Homolka's July 4 release. "(The case) has received some pretty
      wide publicity and I suspect they're taking advantage of that." The film's website suggests the story is
      somewhat sympathetic to Homolka, portrayed by Laura Prepon, who plays
      Donna on That '70s Show. "In the end, the viewer is left to
      ponder their sympathy for Karla, to ask how much she too is a victim of
      Paul," reads the plot synopsis. It further describes Homolka, who is
      believed to be living in Montreal, as "conflicted by her conscience
      but still unable to escape" Bernardo's grasp. The producers, who are still seeking a
      distributor for the film, based their movie on court transcripts. 
 Karla film to debut in Quebec - U.S. producers choose new titleMontreal film fest to get first lookJuly 26, 2021Toronto Star (CP)
 
      MONTREAL�An American film about the horrific sex slayings committed by
      Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka has been renamed and will make its debut
      next month at the Montreal World Film Festival.
         Once titled Deadly, the controversial film
      has officially changed its name to Karla, producer Michael Sellers said
      yesterday. Sellers denied capitalizing on the
      notoriety of Homolka, who was released from prison earlier this month
      after serving 12 years for manslaughter in the deaths of two Ontario
      schoolgirls. Sellers said he wanted a less sensational
      title. "I know that in Toronto the word
      `Karla' just by itself is not a value-neutral word," he said from Los
      Angeles. "It's a word that there maybe has a
      lot of emotion attached to it. "To the global market, it's just a
      name. That is what we'd like to be the starting point for the movie." The film has prompted a call for a boycott
      by Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty and protests from the families of
      victims Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French. It will be screened between Aug. 26 and
      Sept. 5 at the Montreal festival. The $5 million film was directed by Joel
      Bender and stars Laura Prepon (That '70s Show) as Homolka and Misha
      Collins (24, Girl Interrupted) as Bernardo. Serge Losique, head of the festival, said
      showing the film does not signify any sympathy for Homolka's criminal
      behaviour. "I hope people are intelligent enough
      to understand that the biggest criminals in history have been brought to
      the big screen," Losique said in an interview. "It's a sensitive subject, yes, but
      the crimes happened nearly 15 years ago." 
 Deadly film may not be shown hereMay 25, 2021Burlington Post
 By Jason Misner
 The producer of a controversial U.S. movie
      depicting the relationship of convicted killers Paul Bernardo and Karla
      Homolka says he is hoping an agreement about donating film proceeds to
      charity can be reached with the victims' families should the controversial
      movie, Deadly, be released in Ontario. Michael Sellers, producer and
      writer of Deadly, told the Post from his Los Angeles office Tuesday that
      he plans to speak with Tim Danson, the lawyer representing the families of
      slain schoolgirls Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy. Sellers said he will
      suggest donating a majority of the film's proceeds to a charity the
      families are comfortable with -- "something that memorializes the
      victims in a good way." Deadly - which won't be ready for full U.S.
      release until September or October -- has about six weeks of editing left
      before the film is finished, Sellers said. By mid-next month, he said he plans to show
      a copy of the film to Danson, at which time he expects to talk about
      considering giving a portion of the film's box office proceeds generated
      in Ontario to a worthwhile charity. "It really has to generate funds for
      charity," Sellers said. "I'm not talking about a small
      percentage of profits, I'm talking about the majority of the money taken
      at the box office." Homolka and Bernardo stood trial for the
      deaths of French and Mahaffy in the early '90s. Bernardo was convicted of
      two counts of first-degree murder, handed a life sentence and subsequently
      declared a dangerous offender. Homolka was given a 12-year sentence for
      manslaughter in exchange for testifying against her husband. As Sellers completes Deadly, Burlington
      Tory MPP Cam Jackson has introduced a private member's bill that would
      allow the French and Mahaffy families to sue the makers and distributors
      of Deadly for emotional distress. Jackson's Bill 202 has already received
      first reading and could be passed as early as mid-June, depending on how
      quickly all provincial parties respond to the proposed legislation. The politician, who has crusaded for
      victims' rights in the past, said the idea of the bill -- which he noted
      is supported by the families -- is not to censor the movie, but to make
      the makers and distributors accountable for the emotional turmoil the film
      might cause. Jackson said the bill would
      "augment" the existing legislation Bill 210 called the Ontario
      Victims' Bill of Rights -- which he introduced a decade ago -- that
      prohibits criminals from profiting from their crimes by retelling them. Bill 202 is not intended to ban the film in
      Ontario, but is about protecting a person's right not to be re-victimized,
      he said. "We cannot stop production of the
      film," Jackson said. "This has nothing to do with censorship.
      The film can appear anywhere it wants in North America, but if it does
      appear in Ontario the distribution company and movie theatre chain could
      be the subject of a suit. They have the right to decide if they wish to
      take the movie in the first place. "Do I find it offensive? Absolutely.
      There is a price to pay for profiting from this much grief." The Deadly Web site -- which also displays
      a series of print media stories about the movie -- states that "every
      scene of the film was derived from events transcribed in court testimony
      using police reports, interviews between Homolka and her psychiatrist, and
      videotape of the crimes shot by the perpetrators themselves." On the Web site, Sellers states his reasons
      for making the movie. "As an artist and filmmaker, I became
      convinced that creating such a film was a worthy endeavor. In the end, I
      made the judgment that the material could be fashioned into an
      intelligent, provocative and powerful film. "Moreover, I came to feel that aside
      from issues of deeper artistic merit, the film will, in fact, have a
      tangible positive impact by conveying, in a very urgent way, the need for
      vigilance and alertness against the kind of predatory behaviour that Paul
      and Karla personify." He added that, "I also made a
      commitment to myself to do nothing to dishonour the memory of the
      victims." Sellers, careful with his words, said in an
      interview that while he thinks the proposed legislation could have some
      merit, he worried about the potential impact on freedom of speech. "It's an interesting concept," he
      said. "We are doing everything we can to be genuinely sensitive to
      the victims' families' situation but to create a law like that, at this
      point, obviously is a cause for concern and raise questions about free
      speech which others can address better than I can." Sellers said while he's still debating
      whether to pursue showing the film in Ontario, ultimately, if the bill
      becomes law, he said it would likely "kind of seal the deal" for
      the film. "It may not be possible to release it
      all," he noted. If that happens, Sellers stressed the movie
      doesn't live or die by being shown in this province, and that it can still
      survive outside the Ontario marketplace. "Ontario represents a certain upside
      that is difficult to ignore." There is no Canadian distributor secured
      yet, said Sellers, but noted one has shown "strong interest" but
      wants to see the finished product first. Jackson said the showing of the movie will
      do nothing to help the Mahaffy and French families continue their
      difficult recovery from the deaths of their children. "Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French
      died brutally for the private pleasure of Bernardo and Homolka and there
      are many in this province who believe that they didn't die for the rest of
      the public's entertainment. I recognize how much grief the family goes
      through everyday. There's nothing private about this for these
      families." The bill is in the hands of all three party
      house leaders, and it has been presented to Ontario Premier Dalton
      McGuinty. "There has been absolutely no
      dismissal of this bill," Jackson said, adding he consulted with
      layers who have advised him the bill is not unconstitutional. This isn't the first time the families have
      dealt with entertainment outlets wanting to tell the Bernardo/Homolka
      story. The Jerry Springer tabloid TV talk show wanted to interview Homolka
      from jail in 2002, but was denied by Corrections Canada. 
 OntARIO MPP trying to block Bernardo movieMay 20, 2021CTV.ca
 
 An Ontario MPP is trying to block the release of Deadly, a new
      Hollywood-made movie about Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka in his
      province.
 Cam Jackson's private member's bill, Bill
      202, would allow family members of the victims to sue the distribution
      company or a theatre company for emotional distress from the film. Jackson says it's not a matter of
      censorship; it's about protecting family members from being victimized all
      over again. "The principle in law is that you
      can't re-victimize families that have already been victimized by a
      crime," Jackson explained to Canada AM. "This, in a sense, says that you can
      go and sue someone who specifically wants to profit from your pain and
      your suffering as a family." Deadly is slated to be released in the
      United States later this year but could be out in Canada first. Reports
      suggest the movie could be in Ontario theatres around the same time
      Homolka is released from prison, on July 5. Jackson says the producers of the film have
      already violated the rights of the victims' families before the movie has
      even been released, just by naming the victims. "What the producers are cleverly
      trying to do is actually use footage, go back to the scenes of the crime,
      to use the proper names. The fact of it is that you can't do that --
      unless you have the permission of the family or you're willing to risk a
      lawsuit." He notes that one of Bernardo and Homolka's
      rape victims who survived the attack was able to retain her anonymity by
      being called "Jane Doe" in all court documents. But Kristen
      French and Leslie Mahaffy, who were killed, were not afforded the same
      privilege. "When you die, the state takes away
      your voice. And we're trying to give them a voice to say that they do not
      want this to happen," Jackson says. He says the film is filled with images that
      reenact the crimes and he doesn't believe that anyone in Ontario should be
      looking at those pictures. "These are horrendous images that
      re-victimize families, and what for? For the purpose of profit to exploit
      people's grief. Those two children died for the private pleasure of Paul
      Bernardo and Karla Homolka -- not for the pleasure of everybody else in
      Ontario to witness." The MPP, who represents the riding of
      Burlington, sponsored another bill meant to protect the French and Mahaffy
      families back in 1994. That bill became the Victims' Right to Proceeds of
      Crime Act and prohibits criminals from profiting from their crimes by
      retelling them. The bill has meant that Bernardo and
      Homolka have not been allowed to sell movie rights or book rights to their
      story. Any profit they make in their lifetime will be seized by the state
      and go to provide services for victims. The producers of Deadly have offered to
      have some of their profits go to charity. Jackson dismisses the offer. "You have to look at this and try to
      imagine the extraordinary pain that families go through, especially on a
      crime this severe and this public," he says. 
 Movie profits DeadlyMay 19, 2021Toronto Sun
 By Alan Findlay
 
 BURLINGTON MPP Cam Jackson is proposing a
      new law enabling victims of crimes to sue movie-makers.
 His private member's bill, introduced
      yesterday, would make film companies liable for emotional distress caused
      to crime victims and their families in Ontario if their crime is
      reenacted. "Its purpose is to say to a
      distribution company that if you wish to come to Ontario and make a profit
      from retelling this story in its most graphic and horrific details, there
      will be a cost associated with that," Jackson said. "It's not about censorship; it's about
      saying in Ontario we're not prepared to allow our families to be
      revictimized." The bill is unlikely to pass before a new
      movie about Homolka and Paul Bernardo, called Deadly, is released later
      this year. The producer of the film has proposed
      donating some of the movie's proceeds to charity. 
 NEW BILL ENABLES VICTIMS TO SEEK DAMAGES FROM HOMOLKA FILMMay 18, 2021 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE (TORONTO) Today in the Legislature,
      Burlington MPP Cam Jackson tabled his Private Member's Bill 202 that, if
      passed, would make the producer (or distributor) of the film,
      "Deadly," (about murderers Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka)
      liable for the emotional distress caused to the families of their victims
      in Ontario. For the first time, Bill 202 would define
      the revictimization of crime victims through the commercial,
      cinematographic or video recounting of the crimes as constituting
      emotional distress for which civil remedies would be available. Jackson's
      bill supplements his previous legislation, including the historic Ontario
      Victims' Bill of Rights. Jackson's work was instrumental in creating the
      Ontario Office for Victims of Crime, the first of its kind in Canada. Jackson's Proceeds of Crime Bill 210 (1994)
      ensures that financial rewards paid to criminals for the sale of their
      accounts of their crimes are seized and used for services for victims of
      crime and their families. Although very rare for private member's
      legislation, Bill 210 passed 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Reading in the Ontario
      Legislature, all on December 8th, 1994. It received Royal Assent the very
      next day, December 9th, 1994. In June 1993, Jackson was successful in
      convincing the federal government to block the importation of "serial
      killer trading cards" that graphically depict Ontario victims of
      violent crime. Jackson's current bill will also cover such offensive
      products. Jackson's latest Bill 202 has drawn
      wide-ranging support that is understandable given the importance and
      timeliness of his unique initiative. "Cam has once again devised an
      important tactical measure to protect crime victims and I salute and
      support his initiative to protect crime victims from commercial
      exploitation. - The Hon. Dan McTeague MP (Pickering- Scarborough East). "This Bill goes a long way to taking
      the profit out of revictimizing crime victims in Ontario. It also
      introduces some much needed accountability for the Victim Justice Fund so
      that the moneys supposedly dedicated to helping victims aren't squandered
      or left to sit in some bureaucratic bank account." - Scott Newark -
      Former Vice-Chair and Special Counsel, Office for Victims of Crime. "This has nothing to do with freedom
      of expression. It has everything to do with the right not to profit from
      that expression and for victims' families not to have to relive the horror
      of their ongoing pain." - Priscilla de Villiers - Founder of CAVEAT
      and Co-Chair of the Office of Victims of Crime, 1997-2004. Jackson has written to Premier McGuinty to
      seek his support to ensure timely passage of Bill 202 before the
      Legislature adjourns in mid-June. As his letter notes, "The Bill
      provides a specific remedy for crime victims facing an unimaginable
      prospect of re-victimization for profit. We can take effective action to
      prevent this if we stand together and do what's clearly right." - 30 - References: Cam Jackson, MPP 
      416-325-5362 / 905-639-7924 
 18 May 2021 The Honourable Dalton McGuinty, MPPPremier of Ontario
 Room 281, Legislative Building
 Queen's Park,
 Toronto ON M7A 1A1
 Dear Premier, Re: Victims' Bill of Rights Amendment Act
      (Crime Redepiction), 2005 Today I tabled the above private member's
      bill on behalf of victims of crime and I write to ask for your earnest
      support for its speedy passage into law. The Bill amends the Victims' Bill of
      Rights, 1995, to allow victims of a prescribed crime to recover damages
      for emotional distress from a person or body that produces, distributes or
      otherwise makes available to the public, whether or not for profit, any
      visual or audible product that redepicts in any way the circumstances of
      the crime of the circumstances leading up to it, except in two cases. The two exceptions are the cases where the
      product is made available to the public for the purpose of the
      administration of justice or where the product depicts a crime that took
      place more than 50 years before the product was made available to the
      public. The regulations made under the Act can provide for a longer time
      period in that second case. The Bill also amends the Act to require the
      Attorney General to prepare and submit to the Legislative Assembly an
      annual report on the operation of the victims' justice fund account. Premier, this bill, if passed into law,
      would make the producer or distributor of the film "Deadly,"
      which is, as you know, about the murderers Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka,
      liable for the emotional distress caused to the families of their victims
      in Ontario. This Bill provides a specific remedy for
      crime victims facing an unimaginable prospect of revictimization for
      profit. We can take effective action to prevent this if we stand together
      in the House and do what is clearly right. I am writing on behalf of the French and
      Mahaffy families whose children were the victims of Bernardo and Homolka
      to ask you to allow speedy passage of this legislation into law. It is to be hoped that you, Premier, will
      accept this legislation in the same non-partisan spirit that my private
      member's Bill 210 was by then Premier Bob Rae. I enclose for you a copy of
      the Bill that I am sure you will recall as a fellow Member of the
      Legislature in 1994. Bill 210, "An Act to provide for the
      payment of money awarded in civil law suits to victims of crime,"
      (the "received enthusiastic, all-party support in the Legislature and
      passed 1st, 2nd and 3rd Reading in one day, on December 8, 1994. It
      received Royal Assent the very next day, on December 9th, 1994. Premier
      Rae enacted it into law on May 1st, 1995. As you can see, Bill 210 deals with the
      recovery, by a victim of crime, of money awarded to the victim in a law
      suit against an accused or convicted person. Its purpose is to ensure that
      any money that the accused or convicted person (or a related person)
      receives relating to the crime is first used to satisfy awards to victims. Premier, on behalf of the French and
      Mahaffy families, I implore you to do what is in your executive power to
      allow for quickest possible passage of my new bill into law. It has the
      full support of the Leader of the Official Opposition, John Tory and I
      have also written to Howard Hampton, the Leader of the Third Party. Please feel free to call on me directly at
      any time should you or the Attorney General have any questions or comments
      concerning what I know you will agree is a very important and
      time-sensitive matter. Yours sincerely, Cam Jackson, MPP Burlington CC enclosure 
 Producer agrees to delay Homolka filmMay 25, 2021Toronto Star
 By Greg Bonnell, Canadian Press
 A Hollywood movie chronicling the crimes of
      Karla Homolka likely won't hit Canadian theatres until fall to avoid the
      emotional outcry surrounding the schoolgirl killer's release from prison
      this summer, the film's producer said Tuesday. Michael Sellers said a special Toronto
      pre-screening of Deadly, which was originally planned for late June, might
      also be pushed back so it doesn't coincide with the July 5 expiry of
      Homolka's 12-year prison sentence. "As I watch that news coverage coming
      out of (Canada), it's all Karla, all the time," Sellers said from his
      Los Angeles office. "I don't want to be a part of that
      circus, I don't think we should be. I don't think it's the right
      thing." Deadly tells the story of Homolka's
      ill-fated union with Paul Bernardo, a coupling that ultimately claimed the
      lives of Ontario schoolgirls Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French, along with
      Homolka's younger sister, Tammy. Laura Prepon, who plays Donna on TV's That
      70s Show, portrays Homolka as a "woman conflicted by her conscience
      but unable to escape" the grasp of Bernardo, who's played by Misha
      Collins, the film's website says. Homolka was sentenced in 1993 to 12 years
      in prison in exchange for testimony against her husband, in which she
      portrayed herself as an unwitting victim. But caustic videotapes
      documenting the rape and torture of their victims later appeared to expose
      her as a willing participant in the crimes. Critics branded her plea bargain a
      "deal with the devil." Bernardo was convicted of two counts of
      first-degree murder, handed a life sentence and subsequently declared a
      dangerous offender. News of the grisly events horrified
      Canadians, a fact that both supporters and critics of Sellers's film have
      used to argue their cases both for and against its release. Sellers had offered lawyer Tim Danson, who
      represents the French and Mahaffy families, the chance to view the film in
      advance of its release, but Sellers said he's considering waiting until
      after July 4 � the day Homolka is expected to go free. "I'm contemplating the possibility of
      delaying that screening until after she gets out," he said. "Karla coming out must be difficult
      for (the families). Having to deal with this (screening) at the same time
      as dealing with that ... I just feel like we shouldn't do it unless we
      really have a need to." His production company, Quantum
      Entertainment, plans a September or October release for Deadly. It would
      take "a major Canadian distributor banging on my door" to put
      the film into theatres before then, he said. "I'm almost to the point of saying if
      a distributor came to us and said they wanted to distribute it in July or
      August, I would say no." The growing media spotlight on Homolka,
      who's serving out her final days at the Joliette Institution near
      Montreal, is sure to mean Canadians will again be forced to endure the
      horrific details of her crimes. Next week, Ontario Crown lawyers will
      travel to Quebec in an effort to convince a provincial court judge to
      impose restrictions on Homolka under the Criminal Code. That extraordinary request, if granted,
      would see the 35-year-old submit to a range of conditions including a
      curfew, regular meetings with police and rules regarding her
      acquaintances. 
 Families not interested in Homolka film charity planMay 12, 2021St. Catharines Standard
 By Karena Walter
 Local News - The families of Karla Homolka�s
      victims won�t support a plan to give Ontario box office profits from a
      film about the killer to charity because they don�t want Deadly playing
      in the province in the first place. �They would prefer it not be shown in
      Ontario and that there be no profits coming out of Ontario and therefore
      no money for any charity,� Tim Danson, lawyer for the families of
      Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy, said Wednesday. But whether they would agree to charitable
      proceeds from openings in other areas or from a video release hasn�t
      been decided. Homolka is coming to the end of a 12-year
      sentence for manslaughter in connection with the deaths of French and
      Mahaffy. Deadly looks at the meeting of Homolka and
      her ex-husband Paul Bernardo, now serving a life sentence, and how the
      pairing resulted in murders. The independent movie, which its Hollywood
      producer hopes to distribute by fall, has caused plenty of controversy in
      Ontario. Premier Dalton McGuinty urged Ontarians to boycott the film if it
      is released and the province says it will be watching closely to make sure
      it doesn�t violate any publication bans. Film producer Michael Sellers said this
      week he has always intended to donate some of the proceeds of the film to
      charity and he was further prompted by a McMaster university student and
      her friend who wrote to him. At Danson�s request, Sellers is meeting
      with him in Toronto in a few weeks for an advance screening of the movie. The two have been in talks about concerns
      the families have has about the film. Danson said, in fairness to Sellers, the
      producer has been very responsive to concerns. He�s not so responsive that he�s not
      going to make the movie, Danson said, but that wasn�t something they
      could legally stop him from doing. �As a matter of law, he�s entitled to
      do the movie. We�re entitled to not see it and not support it, but we
      can�t stop it unless he crosses a certain line,� Danson said. That line, where free speech ends and the
      families� privacy begins, is what the two sides have been discussing. Danson said Sellers voluntarily agreed to
      edit the film in response to the families� concerns. He expects scenes
      of rape, sexual assault or nudity of the victims won�t be in the film. As well, the names of French and Mahaffy
      were changed at the families� request. �We certainly made it very clear that we
      felt it was entirely inappropriate to use their names and we wouldn�t
      accept it,� Danson said. �Then they kind of changed the names a little
      bit but it was pretty clear and now I think they�ve changed them
      completely.� While an offer to use profits from the
      movie�s release in Ontario for charity may be a moot point for the
      families, using proceeds from other releases such as videos or in other
      geographical locations may be given second thought if suggested. �The jury�s still out on that,�
      Danson said. He said it�s a complicated issue and the
      families are stuck between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, Danson said, by engaging
      Sellers the way they are, it�s given him publicity and one could argue
      the families are assisting in promoting the movie. On the other hand, regardless of what they
      do, the fact the movie exists is going to generate its own publicity and
      they have to protect the memory and dignity of the victims. �Had we not engaged him, that wouldn�t
      have happened,� Danson said. �So you�re making the best of a bad
      situation.� 
 Homolka film: Will it pack the theatres?May 11, 2021St. Catharines Standard
 By Grant LaFleche
 Local News - Taken on its surface, there is
      something unremarkable about the trailer for the film Deadly. Even the image of a teenaged girl, bound
      and blindfolded, isn�t enough to distinguish the film from the legions
      of thrillers and crime movies on the market. But if you know the case well, if you know
      what comes next, that image � which flickers across the screen in the
      blink of an eye � is unnerving. It�s a little like peeping at
      something unsavoury you know you�re not supposed to see. Whether the trailer for the movie about
      schoolgirl killers Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka will titillate the
      curious or repulse the righteous might not matter. The film doesn�t have a distributor in
      Canada or the United States. And without a 20th Century Fox to put the
      movie in theatres coast to coast, Deadly could just quietly vanish into
      cinematic limbo. �Independent films always face an uphill
      battle,� Deadly producer Michael Sellers said in an interview from Los
      Angeles. Officially, the film�s opening date is
      listed only as �coming soon� because without a distributor, no release
      date can be set. �We are looking toward a fall release,
      perhaps in October, after the summer blockbusters are over and before the
      Christmas movies, unless something drastic changes before then,� Sellers
      said. �But that seems to me to be very, very unlikely.� Even if Sellers does find a distributor
      that can put the film in theatres across the United States and Canada,
      there is no guarantee it will become a blockbuster. University of Toronto cinema professor Bart
      Testa said there might be enough interest in Ontario to give the film a
      decent opening weekend, but there will be little interest in the United
      States. �After (the opening weekend), I suspect
      it will disappear very quickly and end up where it belongs, behind the
      counter at the local corner store.� Testa said Sellers� company, Quantum
      Entertainment, mainly produces direct-to-video titles such as Children of
      the Living Dead and Nightmare Boulevard. Deadly might have remained equally
      anonymous if not for the attention of Canada�s news media, Testa said. The film is not generating nearly as much
      interest in the U.S., where the names Bernardo and Homolka are not nearly
      as infamous. Chicago Sun-Times movie critic Roger Ebert
      said in an e-mail, �I have not heard of the film.� Based on Quantum�s past productions,
      Testa said he isn�t expecting much from the movie. �It wouldn�t disrespect B-movies by
      calling this a B-movie,� he said. �If you had a filmmaker like
      Bernardo Bertolucci doing the film, you would get a meaningful exploration
      of it. There would be merit to that. �But this is just going to exploit the
      story for the sake of making a movie,� he said. �And I think that the
      filmmakers will be so worried about censorship that it won�t even be
      titillating. I expect it will be a very bland film.� Yet Sellers and Deadly director Joel Bender
      insist the movie is not mere exploitation of the story. The movie is an exploration of how Homolka
      �went from a normal person to a participant in these horrible, horrible
      crimes,� Bender said. Nevertheless, he said, they tried to be
      sensitive to the feelings of the French and Mahaffy families. Although Tammy Homolka � Karla�s
      younger sister and the first girl killed by the pair � is named, the
      names of their other victims, Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy, are never
      used. �Even the killings themselves are not
      exactly as they happened,� said Bender. �You won�t see the actual killing at
      all. The camera angles are such the murders happen off camera.� The film also faces a challenge that has
      nothing to do with the subject matter or production company. True crime movies are hard sells, says
      Ebert. �Movies based on true crime are not
      usually as successful as completely fictional crime movies, maybe because
      the fictions can be more sensational,� he said in his e-mail. �Yet
      some of the best movies I�ve seen have been inspired by true crimes,
      including In Cold Blood and Monster.� 
 Murder flick may be blacked out in parts of OntarioProducer says he's 'not comfortable' screening Homolka,
      Bernardo film in victims' communitiesMay 6, 2021The Halifax Herald
 By Nicole MacIntyre (Canadian Press)
 HAMILTON - The makers of a film about Karla
      Homolka and Paul Bernardo plan to donate a portion of the proceeds to
      charity or to restrict screenings in Ontario. Producer Michael Sellers said he's willing
      to black out Deadly in areas deeply affected the horrific crimes,
      including St. Catharines and Toronto. "I'm not comfortable with putting the
      movie out normally in Ontario," he said Thursday from his Los Angeles
      office. Sellers said he's also willing to have open
      screenings of the movie and give the majority of local proceeds to
      charity. He plans to consult with the families of
      victims Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy to decide which option is best,
      "black it out or earn a million for charity?" Sellers says a charitable donation was
      always in the works but he was inspired by e-mails from two women who
      challenged him to do something good out of a movie many fear will reopen
      painful wounds. "If you are truly making this film
      because you feel it is a valuable story to tell, that society can learn
      and benefit from, then put your money where your mouth is," McMaster
      student Kelly Peterson wrote to Sellers in March. "Donate all or a portion of the
      proceeds of this film to victims' services, or set up a scholarship in the
      name of the girls that were victimized by these two monsters." Sellers wrote back immediately and asked
      for help in finding the appropriate charity. Peterson and her friend Michelle Berelowitz
      are now working to set up a fund in the victims' memory. "We want something positive to come
      out of it," said Berelowitz. Planning is at an early stage and still
      needs the input of the victims' families, she said. Tim Danson, the lawyer for the French and
      Mahaffy families, could not be reached for comment on Thursday. Sellers has already extended an invitation
      to Danson to preview the movie before it is released later this summer or
      fall. The film won't be done until the end of
      June, Sellers said. A distributor will then decide when and
      where the movie is released. The movie has sparked outrage from some
      Ontario residents who are horrified Hollywood is trying to make millions
      from the agonizing deaths of two schoolgirls. Unable to ban the movie under current law,
      senior politicians have urged people to boycott the film. Attorney General Michael Bryant has also
      warned Sellers and his colleagues at Quantum Entertainment could face
      legal action if the film breaks a publication ban imposed on the evidence
      heard at trial. Homolka is set to be free in less than two
      months. Ontario will take its bid to limit her
      freedoms when she's released from Joliette Institution, north of Montreal,
      before a Quebec judge on June 2. Homolka's father Karel revealed this week
      that his daughter does not plan to return home to St. Catharines. She is planning to live in the
      Notre-Dame-de-Grace area of Montreal, he said. The focus on her release and controversy of
      the movie has created a prime market for Deadly's release, noted Sellers. While local audiences might be horrified by
      the content, he noted it's similar to other true crime movies such as
      Monster, the tale of serial killer Aileen Wuornos. "Everywhere else in the world it's
      just another movie." 
 Homolka film will be pre-screened in Toronto Families' lawyer
      requested viewingMPPs worried about court banMay 4, 2021Toronto Star
 By Greg Bonnell, Canadian Press
 An exclusive viewing of a Hollywood film
      chronicling the depraved crimes of Karla Homolka is being offered to
      interested parties in Toronto in advance of a potential Canadian summer
      release. The controversial film Deadly could come to
      Canada just as the teen girl killer is released from prison, a move
      motivated in large part by sensational media coverage negating the need
      for a long publicity campaign. "We're going to provide an opportunity
      to screen it in advance," said Michael Sellers, producer of Deadly.
      "I will come up to Toronto with a print." That extraordinary move is in response to a
      request to view the film from Tim Danson, the lawyer for the families of
      slain girls Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy. "He won't be the only set of eyes that
      can watch it," Sellers said from his Los Angeles office. "There will be some other people,
      independent-type people, whether it be some media or other concerned
      citizens in Canada I've been in communication with, who I've offered an
      opportunity to see it." Danson hasn't yet responded to the offer to
      view the film, Sellers said. The Ontario Government cautioned yesterday
      that Sellers and his colleagues at Quantum Entertainment could face legal
      action if the film breaks a publication ban imposed on evidence heard at
      trial. "If they break the publication ban and
      enter Ontario, they will face the laws of Ontario," said Attorney
      General Michael Bryant. "The evidence involved in the publication ban
      is remarkably painful to the victims and many Ontarians." While Bryant confirmed someone from the
      Crown's office would view the film to judge whether it's in breach, it
      wasn't clear if that person would be invited to the June screening. Bryant was not willing to detail what
      evidence, if included in the movie, would violate the ban, saying to do so
      would, in effect, break the ban. Deadly chronicles the ill-fated union of
      Homolka and Paul Bernardo, a coupling that ultimately led to the rape and
      torture deaths of French and Mahaffy. Bernardo was convicted of two counts of
      first-degree murder, handed a life sentence and subsequently declared a
      dangerous offender. Homolka secured a 12-year sentence in
      exchange for testifying against her husband. Critics who branded the plea
      bargain a "deal with the devil" were emboldened following the
      release of videotapes documenting the couple's crimes. Homolka's prison term expires July 5, but
      her freedom could be granted as early as June 23 under Corrections Canada
      guidelines. The film's website suggests the story is
      somewhat sympathetic to Homolka, portrayed by Laura Prepon, who plays
      Donna on That '70s Show. "The film is essentially ready for
      distribution at the end of June," Sellers said. 
 hollywood homolka film stirs debateApril 10, 2021Canadian Press
 By Greg Bonnell
 TORONTO -- An ill-fated union of lovers.
      The macabre musings of seemingly ordinary suburban folk. Grisly murders
      that shock a nation. Storylines like these populate Canadian
      cinemas nightly -- that's entertainment. Throw in the names Karla Homolka and Paul
      Bernardo, call the film Deadly and an emotional outcry ensues from
      politicians and the public alike. Condemnations of a Hollywood feature
      dramatizing the crimes of Canada's most most infamous and reviled couple
      have been harsh and numerous. Filmmaker Michael Sellers says he's
      received "tons" of email from Canadians upset he is delving into
      the story. But the sentiment fuelling that protest is
      somewhat of an enigma. Is it concern for the sensibilities of the
      families of the two slain schoolgirls at the centre of this horrific tale?
      Or do explorations of humanity's dark side become simply intolerable when
      viewed through the lens of true crime? "People who do these things are real
      human beings," Sellers, producer of Deadly, said from his Los Angeles
      office. "When you de-monsterize them, and at
      the same time show the reality of how it happened, it's very scary to
      people." Deadly, set for release this fall,
      chronicles the ominous courtship of Homolka and Bernardo and the notorious
      deeds their union ultimately produced -- the brutal murders of Kristen
      French and Leslie Mahaffy. The victims' families are gravely concerned
      about the script, which is woven from court transcripts detailing the
      torture and rape of the teens. "Obviously we're not going to get what
      we want, which is simply to trash the movie and not go forward with
      it," said Tim Danson, lawyer for the French and Mahaffy families. Still, Danson has discussed the film's
      content with Sellers and both are hopeful some common ground can be found. "He seemed to be willing to work with
      us, that it wasn't his intent to violate the girls in the way that we most
      feared, which is simulating what's in the transcript in terms of being
      raped and tortured -- those awful things," said Danson. However, the film's very existence evokes
      strong emotions. "I guess you can make the argument
      that they have a right to make the movie," said Steve Sullivan of the
      Canadian Resource Centre for Victims of Crime. "Just because you have the right to do
      it doesn't make it the right thing to do." Politicians in Ontario, where the grisly
      crimes occurred, have declared a boycott of sorts against the film, urging
      the public to ignore it upon release. Sullivan fears those well-meaning words may
      have the opposite effect and that people will be drawn to Deadly out of
      morbid curiosity. The film's profile is also likely to be
      raised by the fact that Homolka is portrayed by Laura Prepon, who plays
      Donna on That 70's Show, and by all the media attention it's getting in
      Canada. True crime stories have always enjoyed a
      sizeable audience, from Truman Capote's In Cold Blood to Charlize Theron's
      Oscar-winning turn as serial killer Aileen Wuornos in Monster. Despite the public's appetite for such
      fare, filmgoers should consider the larger ramifications of making a movie
      about Homolka and Bernardo, said Sullivan. "You have to weigh what the impact is
      going to be on the people whose lives were most touched by this," he
      said. "I'm not sure this movie is intended
      to give us a better understanding of what happened as much as it is to
      make a dollar." Of the numerous missives directed at his
      company Quantum Entertainment, Sellers says one in particular stands out. "The rationale given was, 'This
      (crime) changed the way (Canada) thought about ourselves and we don't want
      to go back there. We don't want to revisit that experience, it's very
      painful."' That only fuelled Sellers's interest in the
      project. "There is something very deep going on
      there. No other producers that we know, that have been involved in other
      (true crime) films, have been involved in this kind of problem." Exploring the underbelly of humanity is an
      artistic endeavour fraught with peril. "If on the one hand you dehumanize
      such figures, you're implying something almost otherworldly about people
      who are responsible for grave crimes," said Charlie Keil, an
      associate professor of cinema studies at the University of Toronto. "On the other hand, if you humanize
      them, you're saying on some level they're just like you and me. I think
      that's equally disturbing to people." Whatever side the filmmaker falls on,
      there's going to be criticism. The central question -- how can people
      commit such atrocious acts -- is one artists and filmmakers have a right
      to explore, said Keil. "Of course, some people are going to
      hate the answers." 
 Cineplex places hurdle in front of Bernardo filmRequires `tasteful' marketing planOntario theatres expect backlash
By Rick Westhead, Business ReporterToronto Star
 April 8, 2021
 
 Canada's major theatre chains say they won't consider showing the
      controversial movie depicting the horrific murders by Paul Bernardo and
      Karla Homolka unless the producers sign a contract with a Canadian
      distributor.
 But the Hollywood production company behind
      Deadly says it didn't plan to sell the movie here and expects to make a
      fortune regardless; indeed, the producers say their interest lies in
      making "as much money as possible." "In general, we require to work with a
      top film distributor who has a tastefully prepared marketing plan,"
      said Pat Marshall, a spokesperson for Cineplex Galaxy LP, which along with
      Famous Players controls a combined 1,500 movie screens across Canada. If the filmmaker does sign an agreement
      here, the government would assign it a rating and the chain bookers would
      then consider whether there is an audience for it. "Our role isn't to censor film
      product," she said, noting the backlash to Deadly is "very
      Ontario-specific." If the movie were to be released in Canada,
      theatres would likely face boycotts and pickets at a minimum. But Quantum Entertainment, the production
      company that is in the final stages of producing the film, says it will
      make tens of millions of dollars regardless, even if it never appears in a
      Canadian theatre. Even without selling a single movie ticket
      or DVD in Canada, an official involved with production says Deadly stands
      to garner nearly $100 million worth of revenue following its release this
      fall, bolstered by a "best- case" estimate of $50 million in
      U.S. ticket sales. "I have a fiduciary responsibility to
      our investors to try to make as much money as possible from this
      picture," said Quantum Entertainment president Michael Sellers. "It's not like we planned to milk
      Canada," said Sellers, who also produced Fortunes of War, starring
      Martin Sheen, and Goodbye America with James Brolin. "We never
      planned to sell the movie there in the first place." Sellers, who said Deadly was financed by a
      small group of individual investors, added that the movie might garner as
      much as $7 million in foreign distribution rights in countries such as the
      U.K. and Australia and another $30 million in DVD sales and rentals. It might also generate income from sales to
      pay television companies like HBO or Showtime in the U.S. "We think this is a good film,"
      Sellers said. "Homolka and Bernardo are both attractive and at first,
      it seems like Paul is the one in control and then later it looks like
      maybe she's the one driving the bus. It's a compelling story." While activists want to stop theatres from
      showing the movie, which is based on Bernardo and Homolka's kidnapping and
      murder of teenagers Kristin French and Leslie Mahaffy, the hype that has
      engulfed the project may backfire and could ultimately broaden the film's
      prospective audience. U.S. conservatives, for instance, fought
      last year to stop theatres from showing filmmaker Michael Moore's
      Fahrenheit 9/11. The campaign to stop Moore's film from being shown
      backfired miserably. The movie generated $23.9 million (U.S.) in ticket
      sales in its opening weekend, setting a record for a feature-length
      documentary. "Controversy amounts to free
      publicity," said Jason Squire, a former studio executive with United
      Artists, now a film professor at the University of Southern California.
      "The more controversy, the less you have to spend on your advertising
      budget." Deadly, which stars Laura Prepon of the TV
      comedy, That 70's Show, was made for about $5 million, less than one-tenth
      the budget of some of today's large-scale Hollywood blockbusters, Sellers
      said. Quantum will open negotiations in the next
      few weeks with distribution companies such as Sony Pictures Classics,
      Focus Films and Warner Bros. Studios, Sellers said. The movie is scheduled
      to be released this September. "I think there should be an appetite
      for this movie," Sellers said. "It's not like it's the first
      true-crime movie made. In fact, this is probably one of the top 10
      true-crime stories that hasn't been on screen yet." DEJ Productions in Hollywood might be
      interested in distributing Deadly, an official said. It recently
      distributed the movie Dahmer, the story of serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer,
      who was convicted of 17 murders in 1991 and sentenced to 957 years in
      prison. Dahmer was made for about $250,000 yet garnered about $1.5 million
      worth of revenue for DEJ Productions, said Angela Palmieri, a company
      official. "The horror genre in general has been
      on an upswing," she said. "Look at the success of movies like
      The Ring 2, Saw and Amityville Horror. The appetite has increased." If a large distribution company passes on
      the Bernardo-Homolka film, Sellers said Quantum would probably arrange
      with individual theatre owners to show the movie. 
 Bernardo pic meant to be a MonsterL.A. producer defends his film as an art-house work,
      not exploitationBy Simon HouptGlobe and Mail
 Tuesday, April 5, 2021 Page R1
 E-mail Simon Houpt Read Bio Latest Columns
      NEW YORK -- The producer of a controversial feature film about Karla
      Homolka and Paul Bernardo says the movie represents a shift in strategy
      for his small independent film company away from its past as a maker and
      distributor of B-movie genre pictures and into the more respectable niche
      of art-house films with Oscar potential. "This is a move on our part to try and
      reposition ourselves upward a little bit," said Michael Sellers, the
      Los Angeles-based producer of Deadly. Sellers's company Quantum
      Entertainment is a small player in Hollywood, specializing in films made
      for under $5-million that frequently go straight to video. "Deadly represents our evolution as
      filmmakers," said Sellers in a telephone interview. "We've been
      moving a little bit away from the mainstream genre approach and moving
      more into the realm of the well-made smaller film with a more artistic
      orientation, and something that has a little bit more provocativeness, or
      a little bit more of what you could genuinely consider to be artistic
      content." Sellers sees Deadly, with its lead
      character of Karla Homolka played by Laura Prepon (That '70s Show) as a
      character study akin to Monster, the film based on the true story of
      prostitute and serial killer Aileen Wuornos. Her battered past led her to
      torture and murder men. Charlize Theron won an Oscar last year for her
      portrayal of Wuornos. Founded in 1996, Quantum both produces its
      own fare and distributes pictures made by other producers, including the
      Corbin Bernsen stalker pic Nightmare Boulevard, and Spin, Shoot & Run,
      which a description on the Quantum website says is, "a quirky
      thriller" about "a tempestuous beauty on the run carrying a baby
      in one hand and a gun in the other." Sellers says the company's intentions are
      better expressed by the films it has produced like Goodbye America, which
      a Variety critic said would find an audience among viewers, "who long
      for genre pics that pack intelligence, not just firepower." Deadly began as a straight genre film.
      Inspired by the financial success of the 2002 docudrama feature Dahmer,
      about the serial killer and cannibal Jeffrey Dahmer, and the 2003
      straight-to-video thriller Gacy, Quantum's director of distribution Pamela
      Vlastas had been itching to make a true-crime film. In January, 2004, she
      and Sellers were approached by Joel Bender, an editor on one of their
      previous productions, with the Homolka story. "He'd had his eye on it
      for years," said Sellers. "For people who follow true-crime
      stuff, the story is pretty well known. I'd say it's in the top 10, if not
      the top five, of well-known true-crime stories that are out there." After Sellers and Bender worked up a script
      and sent it out into the Hollywood casting community, Prepon immediately
      expressed interest inthe lead role. Tess Harper, who was nominated for a
      best-supporting-actress Oscar for her role in Crimes of the Heart, came on
      shortly thereafter.
 The film shot for three weeks in Los
      Angeles last summer. Only once it was in the editing suite did the
      producers realize "the film had great potential," but it would
      need more work. They scheduled another week ofshooting in December, which Sellers says, "really brought the film to
      a level where we felt like we had something substantial.
 Rather than a true-crime focus on the
      police trying to catch a killer, Deadly is "the story of these people
      and how it happened, and why, with an emphasis on trying to achieve some
      level of understanding about the psychological processes that take place
      in a situation like that." The film unfolds through a series of
      flashbacks framed by a fictional rendition of a psychiatric review that
      Homolka underwent in 2001. "It's Karla, eight years later, trying to
      rationalize and explain what she did," said Sellers. But while Sellers makes comparisons with
      Monster, Deadly does not attempt to absolve Homolka of responsibility.
      "Our standard has been different," Sellers says, referring to
      the fact that Monster was fiction based on a true story. "We didn't
      change the story to make it fit the dramatic model. There are no made-up
      scenes in the movie. "I'm sure there will be people who
      criticize us and say it's too sympathetic, but there are others who will
      say, we're going to have a hard time watching this movie because we don't
      care about [Homolka] after a while." The film is scheduled for completion in
      June and Quantum is projecting a fall release in the United States, likely
      no earlier than October. While the company does not yet have a deal for
      distribution in Canada, there are no laws preventing its release and
      Sellers says the recent flap over the film, including calls by Ontario
      Premier Dalton McGuinty and provincial Consumer and Business Services
      Minister Jim Watson for Ontarians to boycott the movie, has prompted
      expressions of interest from a number of Canadian distributors. 
 Boycott of Bernardo film urgedOntario powerless to stop Deadly from being shownFamilies of victims may be allowed to preview movie
March 24, 2021Toronto Star
 By Philip Mascoll and Robert Benzie
 
 The lawyer representing the families of Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French
      will likely be allowed to preview a copy of a movie that recounts their
      killings, the filmmaker says.
 "I am favourably inclined to sign an
      agreement that would let him (lawyer Tim Danson) see an advance
      copy," producer Michael Sellers said from his Los Angeles office last
      night, where he is currently editing Deadly, the film based on the crimes
      of Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka. Sellers went on to say that after a long
      telephone conference with Danson earlier yesterday, while he made no
      commitment to additional changes in the movie, he felt that he and the
      lawyer were "about 30 seconds apart" in their concerns. Sellers said he had instructed the editors
      who were now putting the film together to make a version that meets the
      families' criteria that will be viewed alongside the version he envisages. The families' concerns were nudity, sexual
      activity with the girls and depictions of torture, he said. "There's about 30 seconds in the movie
      that doesn't fit their parameters as they described it to us." Sellers said he has to talk to his
      attorneys and there will have to be research into Canadian law and Ontario
      law before the final determination on allowing Danson an advance copy. "I am favourably inclined to sign an
      agreement that would let him see an advance copy. I am hoping that once
      they get to see the totality of what we have, their fears will be
      lessened." There was also some concern expressed that
      releasing the movie would contravene the child pornography laws in Canada.
      Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy, were 15 and 14 respectively when they
      died. Danson said he had a lengthy,
      "realistic" discussion with Sellers earlier yesterday. "There is a line between artistic
      content and free speech" that the families don't want crossed, the
      lawyer said. "The families would rather that there
      be no film, because they see it as highly exploitive and violating their
      daughters." Danson said the concerns he expressed were
      not about the right to do movies, but about content. "The families will never support it
      (the making of the movie) but he wanted the families' okay of the
      sensitive areas." At Queen's Park yesterday, Consumer and
      Business Services Minister Jim Watson said Ontarians should boycott the
      "despicable" film. "My hope is that distributors in the
      province of Ontario and in Canada will shun this film and not try to make
      a quick buck out of a very disturbing part of our history," Watson
      said. "We have to think of the families of these two young women who
      were killed by Bernardo." Because the province is no longer allowed
      to censor films after a court ruling, Watson said the government is
      powerless to stop Deadly from being shown here. "Under the Charter there is the
      ability for people to distribute films. Our only condition is if it is in
      breach of the Criminal Code, if it's considered obscene, the police can
      lay charges and that way the film can be stopped from distribution,"
      he said. The film does not yet have a distributor
      and Sellers said Tuesday that it is unlikely to be released until
      September or October - after Homolka finishes her 12-year prison sentence
      in June. Bernardo, declared a dangerous offender, is serving a life
      sentence with no chance of parole. Deadly should never be seen here, Watson
      said. "I'd like to keep it out because I
      think it's a despicable film. "Most Ontarians don't want to go and
      see and this. If it does get distributed, my hope is that the vast
      majority of Ontarians will turn their back on this kind of a film that is
      basically recreating a very horrible and tragic situation," he said. Premier Dalton McGuinty echoed Watson's
      sentiments, saying the project is "an unfortunate development." "I don't think that legally we can
      prevent that movie from being shown in the province of Ontario," he
      said. Deadly stars Misha Collins as Bernardo and
      Laura Prepon, who plays Donna on TV's That 70's Show, as Holmolka. 
 Shun film on killers: PreemHollywood depiction of Bernardo-Homolka set for later
      this yearThu, March 24, 2021Toronto Sun
 By Alan Findlay, Queen's Park Bureau
 
 PREMIER DALTON McGuinty is asking people to
      snub a new movie depicting the story of schoolgirl killers Paul Bernardo
      and Karla Homolka if and when it comes to Ontario. McGuinty doubted the
      province can legally prevent the American movie, titled Deadly, from being
      shown in Ontario later this year, and called it "an unfortunate
      development for people to choose to capitalize on a terrible and horrific
      tragedy." "I certainly will not be viewing that
      movie, and I guess my advice and my encouragement to Ontarians is that
      they would do the same," he told reporters outside his Queen's Park
      office yesterday. Consumer and Business Services Minister Jim
      Watson also encouraged people to stay away in droves. "I think most Ontarians don't want to
      see this," said Watson. NO DISTRIBUTOR He pointed out that the film, set for
      release in September at the earliest, still has no Canadian distributor
      lined up. "If it does get distributed, my hope
      is the vast majority of Ontarians will turn their back on this type of
      film that is basically recreating a very horrible and tragic situation.
      You have to think of the families," Watson said. The movie's website suggests Homolka, whose
      12-year sentence ends this June, could be viewed in a sympathetic light by
      the audience in what will be an ambiguous portrayal. Watson said the province can't prevent
      films from coming to Ontario unless they actually breach the Criminal
      Code. Tim Danson, the lawyer for the families of
      slain teens Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy, said the movie could
      contain child pornography if it attempts to recreate the girls' final
      hours as recorded on videotape by the couple. Danson said the families worked hard to
      achieve the closure of destroying the videotapes and other evidence. They did it so that they wouldn't somehow
      resurface despite a court publication ban. "We're now going to have a Hollywood
      production that simulates what we've destroyed?" said Danson. "It's very, very painful for the
      families." One picture on the movie's website shows
      the exposed back of a blindfolded girl as the actor playing Bernardo
      videotapes her from the front. 
 Lawyer demands advance viewing of Bernardo-Homolka movieGlobe and Mail (Canadian Press)March 23, 2021
 Toronto - A lawyer representing the
      families of two slain Ontario schoolgirls has demanded an advance
      screening of a new Hollywood movie about Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka
      to determine whether he will try to block its release. "We have very serious concerns about
      the film because transcripts (the producers) have... include what went on
      inside the house (and) what was on the videotapes and it's very disturbing
      information," said Tim Danson. The film, entitled Deadly and slated for
      release this fall, chronicles the ill-fated courtship and subsequent
      criminal life of Canada's most notorious couple - a union that ultimately
      led to the murders of Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy. "We're aware they've hired two
      actresses to play the roles of French and Mahaffy and that they intend to
      simulate what occurred inside the Bernardo-Homolka home," said Danson.
      "On that basis, we have requested an advance viewing of the
      tape." Danson said he is "very, very
      concerned" the film's depiction of those gruesome events could be
      construed as child pornography. "The fact that it's simulated is no
      defence - if that information is true, we will use every method we can to
      stop this." Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty called for
      a boycott of sorts against the movie on Wednesday. "I certainly will not be viewing that
      movie, and my advice and encouragement to Ontarians is that they would do
      the same," said McGuinty. "It's an unfortunate development for
      people to choose to capitalize on a terrible and horrific tragedy." The province has no legal power to prevent
      the film being shown in Ontario, conceded McGuinty. But if the film makes its way into the
      province, the Ontario Film Review Board can forward it to police if it
      feels the Criminal Code has been breached. The film's website suggests the story is
      somewhat sympathetic to Homolka, portrayed by Laura Prepon - who plays
      Donna on That 70s Show. "In the end, the viewer is left to
      ponder their sympathy for Karla, to ask how much she too is a victim of
      Paul," reads the plot synopsis. It further describes Homolka, who
      will be released from prison this July, as "conflicted by her
      conscience but still unable to escape" Bernardo's grasp. Danson said he's been unsuccessful so far
      in obtaining an advance viewing of Deadly from its U.S. producers. "If they're not prepared to satisfy us
      that they're not, for example, simulating rapes of children, then I will
      be in contact with the appropriate people in the United States to see what
      kind of legal recourse we can do," he said. "We have no choice but to think the
      worst and we'll have to act accordingly - it's what we don't know that is
      causing concern." The film's producer, Michael Sellers, says
      he's keenly aware of those concerns. "I... made a commitment to myself to
      do nothing to dishonour the memory of the victims," Sellers says in a
      statement posted on the film's website. "All of the people involved
      in creating the film have gone through similar soul-searching." The producers based the film on court
      transcripts, information that was subject to a media ban in Canada. "I guess someone took the view that
      they were part of the public record and were entitled to it - I've read
      those transcripts and it's very, very disturbing stuff," said Danson. Several items of hard evidence from the
      trials, such as videotapes and photographs, were later destroyed, but
      trial transcripts were preserved. "We didn't destroy the transcripts
      because we have to be mindful of the fact that Paul Bernardo - even though
      it's theoretical - will be entitled to parole reviews in the future,"
      said Danson. The French and Mahaffy families are
      concerned the film could violate their daughters' memories. "When we destroyed the videotapes and
      other sensitive material - (the families) really did believe they had
      purged this evil - that their daughters were now free from further
      violation," said Danson. "The thought of a Hollywood production
      simulating what had happened to their daughters is something that's
      excruciating and incomprehensible to them." Even if the film was picked up by a major
      distributor or distributed independently by Sellers's Quantum
      Entertainment, it would be unlikely to make it to a theatre before
      September or October. Quantum has no distribution arm in Canada. 
 Bernardo movie to be released when Homolka isCTV.ca News StaffMarch 23, 2021
 Producers of a movie about notorious sex
      killer Paul Bernardo and his wife Karla Homolka will tie the film's
      release to her release from prison this summer. And that has Tim Danson, lawyer for the
      families of two girls killed by Bernardo, feeling wary. "I, personally would have much rather
      had this come out before she gets out," Danson told CTV News Toronto
      on Tuesday. "It feels a little ... frankly, it makes me uneasy." The movie is called Deadly, and stars Laura
      Prepon from That 70s Show as Karla and Misha Collins as Bernardo. The still images available on the film's
      website show Homolka and Bernardo kidnapping a victim at knifepoint. They
      also show Bernardo and Homolka in bed together, Homolka with black eyes
      and Bernardo being arrested. Danson says according to information he's
      received, some of the terrible things that were done to his clients
      Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy will be recreated on screen. "That is very, very disturbing, and I
      haven't decided yet whether or not it's legal," he says. CTV News Toronto's Paul Bliss says the
      movie's writers used actual transcripts from the trial of Bernardo to help
      create the movie's script. Producer Michael Sellers says in a message
      on the film's website that one goal of his film is to promote
      "predator awareness. "I also made a commitment to myself to
      do nothing to dishonor the memory of the victims," he says. Danson wanted to see the movie before it's
      released, but Sellers said it's too late to make major changes to the
      film. However, Sellers says he wasn't planning
      for the film to be distributed in Canada, adding he can't stop people from
      uploading the film onto the Internet for people to view. Sellers also says he couldn't prevent a
      larger distribution company like Miramax, as one example, from buying the
      rights to the movie and releasing it in Canada. Background Homolka began her 12-year sentence after
      pleading guilty to two charges of manslaughter in 1993. She is scheduled to be released on July 5. Authorities are trying to put as many
      conditions on her release as possible. They fear she may still be a danger
      to the public. Bernardo began his crime career as the
      Scarborough rapist, and was suspected in the sexual assaults of at least
      14 women in the late 1980s. Homolka and Bernardo met in 1987 and were
      engaged in 1989. The first death attributed to them was
      Karla's sister Tammy, who was drugged by Karla so she could be used as a
      sexual treat by Paul. Tammy choked on her own vomit and died. Leslie Mahaffy, 14, was kidnapped by
      Bernardo and Homolka about two weeks before the couple's wedding in late
      June 1991. Kristen French, 15, was kidnapped in April
      1992. Videotapes of the two victims' time in
      captivity were made by their captors. Those tapes were eventually
      destroyed when their usefulness as evidence reached an end. In 1993, Homolka left Bernardo after he
      beat her with a flashlight. She filed charges. This led to his arrest. While she pleaded guilty, Bernardo went to
      trial in 1995. Karla was a witness against him. Besides being convicted on murder and other
      charges, Bernardo was declared a dangerous offender in October 1995,
      making it likely he'll never be released from prison. The case has been the object of books by
      Ontario author Stephen Williams: Invisible Darkness and Karla: A Pact with
      the Devil. There were plans by another movie producer
      to make a film based on Invisible Darkness, but they never came to
      fruition. 
 Bernardo film's release held until fallMar. 23, 2005. 01:00 AMToronto Star
 By Philip Mascoll
 The release of a controversial film based
      on the murders committed by Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka has been
      delayed until fall, the producer says. Deadly, which had been slated for a spring
      release, won't even be shown to distributors until well after Homolka
      finishes serving her 12-year prison term in June, Michael Sellers said
      from Los Angeles last night. Production problems and an additional week
      of shooting in December put the film, which was scheduled to take 10 to 13
      weeks to complete, into its 29th week of production, Sellers said. Speculation that the film had been delayed
      so its release date would coincide with Homolka's release from prison
      began with an independent website and was untrue, Sellers said. The families of Kristen French and Leslie
      Mahaffy and those of the couple's other victims were foremost in his mind,
      he said. "We are trying to get it right. We are
      aware of all the sensibilities and are trying to be responsible," he
      said. Sellers said that even if the film was
      picked up by a major distributor or distributed independently by his
      Quantum Entertainment, it would be unlikely to see a theatre before
      September or October. His company has no distribution arm in Canada. Laura Prepon, Donna on That 70s Show, plays
      Homolka, and Misha Collins portrays Bernardo. Joel Bender is the director. Sellers said the film's script was based on
      court transcripts and other evidence aired at the trial. 
 true horrorCable Pulse 24March 23, 2021
 Will one of southern Ontario's darkest
      skeletons of the past soon be exhumed to entertain popcorn munching
      movie-goers? "Deadly" a Hollywood production
      chronicling the Paul Bernardo/Karla Homolka schoolgirl sex killings could
      be out by the fall, amidst a storm of controversy and local backlash. The sinister duo were responsible for the
      murders of teens Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy. Tim Danson, who represents both of the
      victim's families is fighting to halt the film's release. He, like many
      others, believes the film is exploitative and will further compound the
      families' suffering. "We're aware they have copies of the
      transcript of what is on the videotapes," he said, referring to the
      infamous sex tapes the twisted couple made before killing their victims.
      "And it's our understanding that they intend to do scenes of what
      went on in the house and what was on those videotapes. "We will certainly use all legal
      remedies to prevent the film coming out here in Canada. However if it's
      played in the United States and they put it on the Internet . I mean it's
      going to be very, very difficult." Retired detective Bruce Smollett questions
      the integrity of the filmmakers. He was the lead Toronto lawman on the
      infamous case at the time. "There's always the piranhas in the
      ocean that want to come out and make money off the misery of other
      people," he said. "I'm very disappointed." Norstar Entertainment proposed making the
      film based on the book "Invisible Darkness" a couple of years
      ago. But Telefilm Ontario pulled out their $7 million and the Ontario
      government refused to give tax credits because of the backlash. It goes without saying that finding a local
      distributor will be difficult. "I'm very disappointed if they do get
      a film distributor up here that's willing to show this movie,"
      Smollett added. "To me no good can come of it." The movie was due out this summer, but has
      been delayed by production woes. That means it will likely hit theatres
      well after the release of Homolka, scheduled for July. |